Fusion
Book a demo

Built-in lifecycle

The development lifecycle is built into the app.

On most deliveries the evidence is outside the software. The evidence is a wiki that nobody opens after go-live, a spreadsheet of test results, or a roadmap deck that was wrong by month three. Fusion knows what it is made of, so Fusion keeps that record itself. The roadmap, the workflow gates, the user guides and the test recordings are pages in the application that your people already sign in to. These pages are current, because the work itself updates them.

The application's own user menu is open. The menu lists organisation settings, feedback, user testing, roadmap and what's new, with sign out
Start here, because this menu shows where all of these pages are. Feedback, user testing, the roadmap and the release notes are in the same menu as organisation settings and sign out. Nobody bought a second tool and connected it. These items are pages of the application, in the place where a user looks for them.
The product roadmap shows 89 per cent complete, with eight of nine delivery artefacts done, grouped into Discovery, Design and Delivery phases
This page lists every artefact that the delivery depends on, with the state of each one. The artefacts include the problem statement, the personas, the domain model and the workflow value chain. Eight of nine are done and one is in progress. Each entry opens the document itself. Fusion rewrites the artefacts marked "Living doc" as the software changes, not at the end of a phase. Stakeholders see progress and nobody has to prepare a report.
The roadmap value chain tab shows nine workflows. Fusion tracks each workflow across five gates: spec, build, system testing, user guide and user testing
Nine workflows, and each one has the same five gates: spec, build, system testing, user guide, user testing. A workflow is not finished when the code runs. A workflow is finished when somebody outside the team has read the guide and used the workflow. The counts across the top are the honest state of the delivery, on a page that anyone can open.
The user testing panel, with the Position Setup workflow selected, its five gates, and a notice that recording stays disabled until the user guide is done
A user opens this panel from their own menu and selects the workflow that they will test. A user can record only the workflows that have a finished user guide. This workflow does not have a guide yet, so the app says so and the recording does not start. After the guide is done, the app tells the user how to run the session, and stores the recording against the workflow's user-testing gate. Feedback is not a survey that we send afterwards. Fusion collects feedback in the application, at the moment the person uses the new feature.
The what's new page inside the application shows release v0.6.0, with its changes grouped into added, changed and removed
Every release writes its own notes on this page, grouped into what was added, changed, fixed and secured. The notes are in the language of the business, not commit messages. For example: "Positions — open an executive search at a portfolio company, assign an owner, and watch the stage progress from Open through In Progress to Filled." The security entries name the fix and the CVE. Your users read this page. Your auditor reads this page too.
The roadmap is a page in the app, not a slide Five gates on every workflow Fusion collects evidence where the work happens

Built AI-native

Ask for a change. Everything that it touches moves with it.

We did not add AI to Fusion afterwards. We built the framework for AI to work on, so the framework knows what it is made of. The framework knows which spec describes which workflow, which code implements it, which tests cover it, and which guide explains it. When you ask for a change, the framework already knows the full list of things that change with it.

Somebody asks for

“Add a risk rating to the intake workflow. Anything rated high must route to the compliance queue for sign-off.”

One sentence, from somebody who does the job. Nobody had to translate the request into a change request first.

What moves with it

  1. 01

    The specs

    Fusion updates the workflow spec, the resource specs and the domain model to describe the new field, the new rule and the new route.

  2. 02

    The code

    Fusion writes the fields, the logic, the screens and the database migration to the conventions that the framework already holds.

  3. 03

    The tests

    Fusion writes unit and system tests for the new behaviour, then runs them. When a test fails, Fusion fixes the code, never the test.

  4. 04

    The user guide

    Fusion rewrites the user guide against the screens as they now are, and records the walkthrough video again.

  5. 05

    User acceptance

    Fusion prepares the task script, analyses the sessions, triages the findings into issues and queues them for retest.

  6. 06

    The plan

    Fusion updates the roadmap status, the changelog entry and the tech-debt ledger.

  7. 07

    The release

    Fusion deploys the change, and then verifies it in production.

4–8h

Request to production

A change of this size goes to production the same day. The person who asked for the change sees it work before they go home. They do not wait for the change to appear in a release three months later.

80/20

AI effort · human effort

AI does the writing: the specs, the code, the tests, the guide. Your people spend their fifth of the effort on the two parts that need a person. They decide what must change, and they judge if the result is correct.

Fusion knows what it is made of

The roadmap, the domain model, the specs, the code, the tests and the guides are a declared chain. They are not a folder of documents that are near each other by chance. A checker follows that chain and reports each item that no longer agrees with its neighbour.

A named skill for every step

Fusion does not use one general assistant that guesses at your house style. Each step has its own skill, with its own inputs, its own outputs and its own definition of done. We ship and version each skill with the framework, so the conventions arrive with the code.

You approve at every checkpoint

The orchestrator stops and waits: at the workflow spec, at the resource specs, at the test coverage. Nothing reaches production only because a machine decided that it had finished. The work is faster, and the judgement stays yours.

See the lifecycle run on your workflow, not ours.

The fastest proof is a live one. In Idea to Impact, you watch the roadmap, the gates, the tests and the guides stay current while we build the software.

See Idea to Impact Book a session